Privacy Policy
Information Collection and Use
O’Brien & Ryan, LLP collects personal information when you submit information via email or through our website. O’Brien & Ryan, LLP uses this information for the following general purposes: to fulfill your requests for services, improve our services, contact you, and conduct research for internal use.
Information Sharing and Disclosure
O’Brien & Ryan, LLP does not rent, sell, or share personal information about you with other people or companies except to provide products or services you have requested.
Cookies
O’Brien & Ryan, LLP does not set cookies at this time.
Confidentiality and Security
O’Brien & Ryan, LLP has appropriate security measures in place in our physical facilities to protect against the loss, misuse or alteration of information that we have collected from you at our site.
Changes to this Privacy Policy
O’Brien & Ryan, LLP may update this policy. We will notify you about significant changes in the way we treat personal information by placing a prominent notice on our site.
Questions and Suggestions
If you have questions or suggestions, please contact us at:
O’Brien & Ryan LLP
Hickory Pointe
2250 Hickory Road, Suite 300
Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462
(610) 834-8800
Effective Date: April 1, 2005
O'Brien & Ryan News
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
District Court Considers Whether Expert Testimony in Med Mal Action Should Be Precluded on Basis of Federal Rule
United States District Court Judge William H. Yohn, Jr. recently had the opportunity to consider whether expert testimony in a medical malpractice action should be precluded on the basis of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow...
PA Superior Court finds Communication Between Attorney and Expert Witness is Not Discoverable Unless it Forms Basis of Expert’s Opinion
In Barrick v. Holy Spirit Hospital, Sodexho Management, Inc., et al., Carl Barrick was injured on the property of Defendant, Holy Spirit Hospital, when a chair he was sitting on in the hospital cafeteria collapsed on March 29, 2006. Barrick filed suit against...
Appellate Division of New Jersey Superior Court Reexamines Entire Controversy Doctrine in Legal Malpractice Case
In Sklodowsky v. Lushis, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey recently had the opportunity to reexamine the application of the entire controversy doctrine to legal malpractice actions. John F. Lushis, Jr., Esquire represented Paul G....
Superior Court Grants Petition for En Banc Re-Argument in Attorney Work-Product Privilege Matter
In a three-judge panel’s decision filed on September 16, 2010, the Superior Court in Barrick v. Holy Spirit Hospital of the Sisters of Christian Charity, et al. affirmed the trial court’s order of October 16, 2009, which granted the discovery and production of...
Montgomery County Judge Finds No Conflict of Interest Regarding Defense of an Insured Between Insurance Company and its Hired Attorney
In the court’s opinion of August 6, 2010, Judge Kent H. Albright refused to recognize a conflict of interest existing between Defendant-insurance company and its appointed attorney when Defendant invoked a reservation-of-rights clause to potentially limit the coverage...
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
Join Our Newsletter
Join our quarterly newsletter list for legal updates and firm news. Just enter your email below.